October 21, 2025

Slope of Enlightenment

work in progress

nexos.ai doing their best to fit into one photo
where we think technology is VS where it actually is

It happens again and again. Autonomous cars took almost 20 years for the last 1% to make it safe enough – but now, rolling out. Similar to electric vehicles – I am still having discussions with friends stating that, "look, Porsche is getting back to petrol" – but in reality, there is no competition anymore – electric won, by a large margin (and 800 km range). EV sales are growing 25% annually; yet we don't see full effect since China represents almost two-thirds of electric cars sold globally (yes we talk Norway, but half of new car sales in China are electric). AI will go through the same curve, the moment we get bored with ChatGPT, companies will be rolling out AI-powered robotics and whatever else.

rounds and capital

founder's guide

further insights

It requires non-consensus investing, but that’s only part of it. I think courage is thinking independently, and betting BIG on something when it feels really really hard to do it. Courage is putting yourself, and your reputation, and your firm on the line, and being willing to face real consequences if it doesn’t work. It’s not just a willingness to look dumb, but it’s a willingness to get fired. The best founders do this almost every day.
the hard skills are getting softer and the soft skills are getting harder

ecosystem

  • Traveling last week which always makes me think about infrastruture, regulation, and what makes societies better than others. Rant edited with AI.

The Missing Layer Limiting Baltic Countries

The biggest problem in the Baltic states isn’t capital, talent, or entrepreneurship. It’s the chronic underinvestment in governance capacity — in the people who actually run the machinery of the state.

We have too few world-class leaders in the public sector. Not politicians — professionals. Career civil servants with the competence, confidence, and vision to shape policy and see it through.

We can’t afford to be governed poorly. Yet we keep mistaking good intentions for capability. It’s not enough to send delegations to Singapire, post photos of how everything works there, and hope to copy-paste the results. What’s missing is world-class leadership in bureaucracy — people who understand regulation, infrastructure, and economic development at the frontier level, and who can mobilize resoures toward a clear vision.

When that kind of leadership exists, it compounds.

Think of Lithuania’s Fintech ecosystem — built not by accident, but by a small, sharp group of people who knew what they wanted to achieve and how to make it happen. Or Estonia’s e-Residency, which turned a niche digital program into global soft power.

Across the region, there are isolated pockets of excellence like these. But on average, there’s a massive performance gap. Imagine if transport, education, or healthcare were led by people who actually knew their fields in depth — and had the authority and persistence to drive evidence-based reform.

We keep over-indexing on elections — on who gets elected, who forms a coalition — while ignoring the fact that most high-performing economies are steered by a professional public service that remains steady regardless of political cycles. We could survive mediocre politics if we had a layer of bureaucrats who were truly world-class.

That’s the real leverage small countries like Lithuania have: competence density in key public institutions. And yet, for decades, we’ve failed to transform how government recruits, trains, and retains talent. We pray for better education, healthcare, or transport, but none of that is possible without capable people in the right positions.